Tuesday, 17 February 2009

Transforming Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

Introduction and goals
With a global economy that interconnects every country around the world, the demand for highly skilled professionals increases. Attracting, retaining and graduating high-quality students in high-tech degree programmes is a growing challenge. Innovations in teaching aimed at increasing the success of more students in higher education are urgently needed. Evidence is emerging that the effective use of technology combined with exemplary teaching can positively impact student academic outcomes.
 
The HP Technology for Teaching Higher Education Grant Initiative is a catalyst for education innovation, supporting the development of mobile technology environments that, at their fullest implementation, will:
 
Expand access to high-quality higher education opportunities
Transform teaching and learning in the higher education environment, increasing students’ success
Be a catalyst for larger campus initiatives in integrating technology into the learning environment
Engage a large number of faculty in adopting and implementing these models in their classrooms
Foster publication, demonstration and presentation opportunities for academic leaders on the application of technology in higher education learning environments
Contribute to the worldwide “community of practice” faculties who are using technology in innovative and effective ways

The HP University Grant Initiative is designed to support universities around the world. In 2008, HP will select approximately 12 campuses in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) that submit exemplary proposals. This request for proposal is available by invitation only, and grants will be awarded on a competitive basis. Not all campuses that are invited will be selected. Institution eligibility, proposal review considerations, application instructions, and key due dates are listed below. Proposals must be submitted online in English, no later than 5:00 p.m. Central European Time on Monday, 31 March 2008. 
 
Description of the grant award

The 2008 HP Technology for Teaching Higher Education Grant award is valued at approximately USD $100,000 and includes several elements. 

A product bundle for one faculty member and a classroom, valued at approximately USD $80,000 
(HP list price incl VAT)

Faculty solution:
One HP Compaq Notebook/Tablet PC with Microsoft® Vista operating system  
One HP Ultra-slim Expansion Base with DVD drive
One HP AC SmartAdapter for Tablet PC
One HP USB optical travel mouse
One HP executive carrying case

Classroom solution:
20 HP Compaq Notebook/Tablet PCs with Microsoft® Vista operating system 
20 HP Ultra-slim Expansion Base with DVD drive
20 HP AC SmartAdapter for Tablet PCs
20 HP USB optical travel mouse
3 HP iPAQs
1 HP Designjet 
1 HP Designjet Printer Stand
1 HP Procurve Wireless Access Point
1 HP HP ProCurve Switch 408
1 digital projector (external vendor)
1 Mobile Net Education Center (width 133,4 cm, height 120 cm, depth 66 cm, weight 163kg empty)

USD$20,000 cash grant for the principal investigator to use to support the work of the project. 
This funding can be used to:
Cover faculty time, offsetting the normal course load, or to share with other faculty and/or interns supporting the project
Purchase additional project materials, including a wireless router, a digital projector or software
Cover the costs of a public campus celebration event or reception at the beginning and/or conclusion of the first year of the project
Cover miscellaneous travel expenses related to attending the HP Technology for Teaching Worldwide Higher Education conference
Note: The cash portion of this grant comes to the institution as an unrestricted cash award. HP will not allow the cash award to be used to finance indirect costs.

Attendance at the annual HP Technology for Teaching Worldwide Higher Education 
conference in early 2009, a gathering of all recent grant recipients. HP will provide
registration, travel and hotel accommodations for a single participant from each institution to
attend this event.

Eligibility requirements
This grant program is competitive, by invitation only. Not all invitees will receive an award. 

To be considered for a 2008 HP Technology for Teaching Higher Education Grant, a project proposal must:
Be invited by HP to apply
Be an accredited two year or four year, public or private, college or university that is not listed in any government “watch list” for terrorism 
Propose a course redesign project for one or more undergraduate courses, where at least one course is focused on one of the following eligible disciplines:
Mathematics
Science (physical, environmental, computer)
Engineering (electrical, computer, mechanical, environmental, materials)
Information Systems / Information Technology
Business / Entrepreneurship
The proposed project redesigns a course whose credits may be applied toward the completion of a university or college degree in business, engineering, science, information systems, or computer science
Describe a project team that includes at least two faculty members who will be using the technology for teaching
Have pre-approved the HP “Terms and Conditions” associated with HP grants 
Have administrative support (as stated in the proposal)
Meet the minimum infrastructure requirements to support the use of the technology
Adequate infrastructure (electricity, buildings, internet access, etc.)
Existing or planned high-speed wireless computing environment
IT resources that will be committed to support the use of the granted equipment 
Not have received a higher education grant from HP in 2007 or 2006 

Review criteria
To receive an award, a proposal must provide exemplary answers to the questions provided in the HP Request for Proposals. Criteria to be used to evaluate the proposals will include, but will not be limited to:

Primary criteria 
Proposed project is likely to result in sustainable advances in teaching and learning. 
A strong and committed project team consisting of at least two faculty members. Ideally, project teams will include other participants, such as faculty/staff with pedagogy, educational technology and/or instructional design expertise, and the active support of a key administrator. The principal investigator (full-time faculty member) should have demonstrated institutional and instructional leadership in his/ her discipline and/or campus. 
Project proposals must:
Clearly describe why this project is important - what fundamental teaching and learning issues are being addressed through the project
Describe how the granted HP technology will contribute to resolving the teaching and learning issues. 
Have specific plans for measuring the success of the project in terms of student learning outcomes (improved grades, increased enrollment and retention, improved performance on recognized tests, increased quality of student project etc.), in comparison with baseline data from the years prior to this project
Have specific plans for communicating the project outcomes, on campus and beyond
The project contributes toward the attainment of the institution’s vision and plans for broader deployment of mobile technology solutions in the learning environment

Preference will be given to universities that:
Serve significant under-represented, low income or otherwise marginalized populations of students (e.g. women pursuing computer science)
Propose projects that increase the institution’s capacity to offer project-based learning experiences for undergraduate students engaged in community service (local or abroad). These programs are sometimes described as “service learning” or “engineering abroad” programs where students experience the relevance and excitement of applying engineering principles to address real societal issues.
Propose a project that includes using the technology to support a pre-college outreach program aimed at increasing the pipeline of under-represented students pursuing math, science, or engineering (e.g. an on-campus summer program for low-income pre-college students)
Propose projects to improve undergraduate courses related to environmental engineering or entrepreneurship

Examples
To review examples of previously funded projects, visit the Higher Education HP Technology for Teaching global gallery of project web pages at hp/go/hpteach-hied. Additional information is shared on the blog by Jim Vanides, “Teaching Learning and Technology in Higher Education” located at hp/go/hied-blog. 

Grant recipient commitment
This grant of equipment and cash is awarded to the college/university. The HP equipment is the property of that organization, to be used by the principal investigator and team for implementation of the proposed project. 
By accepting the grant award, the organization, its directors and staff members make the commitment to:
Complete the proposed grant project
Provide the proper IT infrastructure and support to ensure program success, including installation and proper maintenance
Create a public webpage that describes the project
Title, abstract, contacts
Project rationale (why this project was chosen; what educational issues it is meant to address)
Implementation (changes in pedagogy; use of technology)
Impact (on teaching and learning)
Brief video vignettes and/or photos that explain the context and impact of the project
Provide HP with private project update reports twice per school year for two years by responding to an HP web-based survey
The number of students impacted
The extent to which the project has impacted student learning (on a scale of 0–4), with a description of the evidence collected (open-ended text describing the outcomes measured)
The extent to which the project has impacted teaching (on a scale of 0–4), with a description of the evidence collected (open ended text describing the outcomes measured)
Unexpected outcomes and other comments
Summary statement from key administrators
Quotes from students and faculty
Suggestions for how HP can enhance this grant initiative
Participate in a Worldwide HP Mobile Technology conference in early 2009, which includes an informal presentation poster session
Abide by the HP Terms and Conditions that were accepted during the application process. Please reference the terms and conditions of gift that were sent to you during the application process.

Proposal Workshop Webinar
Date: 23 January 2008, 5:00 pm Central European Time
A live web-based overview of the program and elements of a strong proposal will be held on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 at 5pm CET. Identified principal investigators and campuses considering applying are encouraged to attend. Meeting logistics will be sent to teams that register their Intent to Apply (below).

Intent to apply
Deadline: 21 January 2008, 5:00 pm Central European Time
If you feel you meet the eligibility requirements and are willing and able to fulfill the grant recipient commitments associated with this grant, please confirm your intent to apply online at http://hpwebgen/questions.cfm?id=8346&pass=29558

You will be asked to provide: 
The name of the principal investigator (PI), who will be the primary contact for the proposal
The PI’s e-mail address
The PI’s phone number
The name and location of your institution
HP will provide instructions for submitting your proposal in early 2008 to the contact and email provided in the Intent to Apply process above.

Required elements of your proposal
Proposals must provide answers, in English, to the questions below. Additional content and attachments will not be accepted. The online application system will open in February, 2008. In the web-based system you will be asked to enter responses to the questions below directly into fields in the order shown. You may want to first compose your responses to these questions in a text file, then cut and paste the responses into the corresponding fields of the online grant application. Use plain ASCII text only (no special characters, please!).

Institutional environment
1. Technology vision (150 words maximum) Describe the campus’ vision of the role of technology in teaching and learning. Please include the specific vision or technology strategic plan for the department, if one exists. If the campus has a strategic initiative on the role of mobile computing, please elaborate.

Project details
2. Project name A brief title for your project.
3. Project executive summary (200 words maximum) Provide a high-level overview of your project in an executive summary. Describe how students will benefit from the course redesign and the application of mobile technology.
4. Focus on learning (300 words maximum) Describe the primary student learning issues that the project will address through changes in teaching. Respond to the question: Why is this project important to students and instructors?
5. Goals, objectives and outcomes (500 words maximum) Provide the overall project goal(s). Under each goal provide objectives that are specific and measurable. Objectives focused on student learning outcomes are a critical element. Describe how each of the objectives will be measured and documented. Describe how success in meeting the objectives will be determined, including what you will use as a comparison group against which you can compare the effectiveness of the proposed course redesign. For guidance on measuring student outcomes, you may want to read materials available at http://abet.org/assessment.shtml and the SRI “Measuring Learning” guidebook, available at http://ctl.sri/projects/displayProject.jsp?Nick=hpguide.  
6. Technology integration (400 words maximum) Describe how the granted HP products will be used to support the goals of the project and how the learning environment will be changed as a result of the introduction of the new technology. Respond to the question: How will this project change what faculty and students do in the teaching/learning environment? Describe how the HP products will contribute to resolving the fundamental instructional and learning problem previously described. Specifically describe how the unique on-screen “inking” capability of a tablet pc will be used and how wide-format printing will support your instructional goals;
7. Project timeline (200 words maximum) Provide a timeline for project completion with periodic milestone identified. The project timeline should commence when the hardware is delivered and continue for 24 months (two academic years).

Project context 
8. Course impacted (100 words maximum) Describe the course or courses that will be redesigned for this project; include course number and the department in which the course(s) reside. 
9. Course redesign (200 words maximum) Describe how the course, curriculum and/or teaching will be altered to take advantage of the technology.
10. Course discipline The proposed course redesign project affects courses in the following disciplines (check all that apply)  Mathematics  Science (physical, environmental, or computer sciences)  Engineering (electrical, mechanical, materials, computer)  Environmental engineering  Information Systems / IT
11. Faculty (25 words maximum) How many professors/faculty will be directly involved in this project?
12. Students (25 words maximum) Approximately how many students will be impacted during the first full year of this pilot project implementation? What percentage of these students are women and/or under-represented?
13. Extra Consideration (optional) The proposed project includes the following elements (check all that apply, and describe):  Serves a significant number of under-represented / marginalized students;  Engages engineering students in projects that serve the community;  Plan includes pre-college outreach;  Proposal is directly related to environmental engineering; Proposal is directly related to entrepreneurship development;

Please describe each element that you may have checked. 

Sharing best practices
14. Project visibility (200 words maximum) Provide a plan for developing visibility both on the campus and in the greater academic community. Plan may include publication of the project and its impact, presentations, and/or demonstrations at academic or industry events, etc.

Team
15. Please provide the following contact details:
Principal investigator(s) Name, title, discipline, address, phone, fax, e-mail. Please note: The person listed as the principal investigator will become HP’s primary point of contact for this grant.
Additional team members Name, title, role on project, e-mail address.

Administrative support and approval
16. Key administrator Name, title, discipline, address, phone, fax, e-mail.
17. Statement of support from key administrator. Initial and ongoing project success depends on the active support and involvement of campus leaders. Please indicate what type of support (financial or otherwise), leadership and involvement will be provided by the administrator. Indicate what campus funding, services, or matching resources will be committed to this project, should it be selected; also indicate what support will be provided to ensure the long-term success of the project, beyond the two year grant period.
18. Approval of terms and conditions Do you, as an authorized campus administrator, approve the HP terms and conditions? To be considered for a grant, an authorized campus administrator must accept the HP terms and conditions of gift prior to the submission of the proposal. Please reference the terms and conditions of gift that accompanied the invitation.
19. Privacy terms and conditions Please confirm that  you understand HP’s data privacy policies (http://hp/hpinfo/globalcitizenship/privacy/masterpolicy.html ), and agree that the information your school has provided may be used by HP to send you information related to this grant application and other HP Philanthropy related programs.

Institution information
20. Institution name Legal name, mailing address, phone, fax
21. Institution mission statement Describe the mission of the institution
22. Institution tax ID number Tax number appropriate for your country. (For example, in the U.S. this is a 9-digit number formatted XX-XXXXXXX)
23. Tax exempt   Yes    No      If tax exempt, please provide evidence
24. Shipping instructions Shipping contact’s name, phone, fax, e-mail, shipping address for equipment delivery. (A physical address, capable of receiving two or three pallets of equipment, is required; no P.O. boxes please!)

Deadline for submission
Monday, 31 March 2008, 5:00 pm Central European Time
Proposals must be submitted in English online at the URL provided by HP after you register your intent to apply. 

Notification of recipients
HP will make award announcements no later than 1 May 2008, and post a list of institutions that have been funded on the HP Technology for Teaching website hp/go/hpteach


About HP
HP is committed to being a leader in global citizenship. We are proud of our efforts as global stewards, helping to reduce environmental impacts, raise standards in HP’s global supply chain and increase access to information technology worldwide. We conduct our business with uncompromising integrity and strive to live up to every one of our commitments to our customers, partners, employees and shareholders. Furthermore, we believe that global citizenship is good business. We embrace our responsibility to society by being an economic, intellectual and social asset to each country and community in which we operate.
HP focuses on simplifying technology experiences for all of its customers – from individual consumers to the largest businesses. With a portfolio that spans printing, personal computing, software, services and IT infrastructure, HP is among the world’s largest IT companies, with revenue totaling $104.3 billion for the four fiscal quarters ended Oct. 31, 2007. More information about HP (NYSE: HPQ) is available at hp.
For further information
Visit the HP Technology for Teaching Grant website at hp/go/hpteach. If your questions are not addressed in the Frequently Asked Questions area, you are welcome to submit your own question through the online form available on that web page.
Examples of previously funded higher education projects from around the world are available at hp/go/hpteach-hied. You may also subscribe to our blog, “Teaching, Learning, and Technology in Higher Education” hp/go/hied-blog for descriptions of emerging best practices and pointers to other relevant information.

Capstone Projects using the HP Technology

Capstone Projects using the HP Technology

The HP Technology for Teaching Higher Education Grant Initiative is designed to support colleges and universities around the world. In 2007, a proposal submitted by Dr K.Sandrasegaran and Dr K. Yasukawa at UTS was selected by HP (Asia Pacific) for funding. 
We are now looking for a group of highly motivated capstone students in ICT-related Majors (SE, CSE, TE, and ICT) and EE Majors to work on this grant as part of their capstone project. 

Introduction and Goals 
Evidence is emerging that the effective use of technology combined with exemplary teaching can positively impact student academic outcomes. The HP Technology for Teaching Higher Education Grant Initiative is a catalyst for education innovation, supporting the development of mobile technology environments that, at their fullest implementation, will: 
• Expand access to high-quality higher education opportunities. 
• Transform teaching and learning in the higher education environment, increasing student success. 
• Be a catalyst for larger campus initiatives in integrating technology into the learning environment. 
• Engage a large number of Faculty in adopting and implementing these models in their classrooms. 
• Foster publication, demonstration and presentation opportunities for academic leaders on the application of technology in higher education learning environments.
• Contribute to the worldwide “community of practice”, faculty who are using technology in innovative and effective ways. 

Equipment to be used 
The 2007 HP Technology for Teaching Higher Education Grant award includes . 
• Twenty wireless HP Tablet PCs with Microsoft® Windows® XP Tablet PC Edition 
• Twenty external drive bay and DVD-CDRW optical drives 
• One HP Access Point with wireless card 

Each HP tablet will be made available to a group of students enrolled in a subject for a 1-3 hour classroom or lab activity only. The tablets will not be available to students outside class hours. Capstone project students will be given limited access to the tablets for development and testing purposes.

Capstone Projects
We are now looking for innovative capstone projects that will use the above equipment for new classroom activities in various subjects in the ICT-related Majors (e.g. 48720 Network Fundamentals, 49048 Wireless Networking, 48740 Communication Networks, etc.). The capstone student must have successfully completed the subject in which the learning activity will be used.
The aim of the capstone project is to produce or "engineer" innovative learning activities in the  classroom or laboratory that enhance the learning outcomes of students enrolled in a subject by bridging the divide between theory and practice through the use of mobile technology. It is anticipated that integrating mobile technology in a class room and laboratory environment will allow introduction new pedagogies whilst at the same time exposing students to state of the art technologies, applications and tools which are relevant to the subject. 

The learning activities and use of HP technology should satisfy the following conditions:
a) It should fit within the goals of the HP Technology Grant given above. 
b) It is anticipated that the activity shall simulate authentic professional practice and give greater ownership and responsibility to students in negotiating their learning experiences;
c) It should address development of students’ technical knowledge acquisition and skills development, as well as broader professional skills such as teamwork, time management, ethics and communication. It should engage students with new and emerging technologies.
d) The learning activity should enhance some of the learning outcomes of the subject and should be approved by the subject coordinator.
e) It should be possible to measure through surveys and other mechanisms the impact on student academic outcomes due to the learning activities and the effective use of technology. 
f) The classroom learning activities should be designed in such a way that they will not be possible without the use of the mobile technologies.
g) The learning activities will be scheduled for the second half of the Spring 2007 semester.
One of the capstone project will produce learning activities that will be used for Open Day, Science Week, and School Visits.

Known Stake-holders
Project leaders: Dr K.Sandrasegaran and Dr K. Yasukawa
Subject Coordinator: e.g. 48720 network Fundamentals (Mr A. Kadi) 
Users: Students enrolled in a subject who will use the planned learning activities. 
Developer: Capstone project students who will develop, document the learning activities in consultation with the project leaders and subject coordinator. 
Technical Consultant: An expert of the HP Mobile and Networking Technologies (TBA)

Capstone Proposal 
On the standard FoE Capstone proposal, the following should be included
Names of Students:
Subject name: 
Brief description of the activity
How does the proposed activity satisfy conditions (a)-(g)?
How do you propose to document the classroom learning activity?
How do you propose to measure the impact on student academic outcomes? 
References to be used 

Capstone Timeline (Spring 2007)
Week 1 –  Completed proposal literature review. 
Week 3 -   Learning Activities designed and documented
Week   5 - Learning Activities tested with small group and updated.
Week 7 -  Class room learning activity 1 completed and documented.
Week 9 -  Class room learning activity 2 completed and documented.
Week 15 – Submission of thesis, paper, CD, log book, and web page. 

Expectations and Deliverables of the Capstone project
-Extensive literature review related to the project before week 1 of the semester in which the project is carried out. This must be presented along with the project proposal.  
- Must meet with your supervisor on a fortnightly basis and present one of the five pre-assigned deliverables of the project in a professional presentation.  
- Must send by email an accurate set of minutes within 1 day of a meeting with the supervisor(s).  
- Must submit the thesis on time as stated in the Capstone Handbook  (End of Exam Week 2) 
- Must submit a 6 page, double column paper based on the important contributions of the capstone by the Monday of Exam Week 3. 
- Must maintain a website about the capstone project. 
- Log book (as per capstone requirement)
- Must submit a CD at the end of the project containing all of the project related material. 

How to register your interest?
Please send me an email at kumbes@eng.uts.edu.au
If you want to discuss any issues related to the project, please see me at the following times: 
Office Hour; Monday 2- 3 pm in Building 1, Level 24, Room 2420B 
LDC1: Friday 1-2pm

Controversy

Controversy

HP pretexting scandal
Main article: 2006 HP spying scandal
On September 5, 2006 Newsweek published a story[30] revealing that the chairwoman of HP, Patricia Dunn, had hired a team of independent electronic-security experts that later spied on HP board members and several journalists, to determine the source of a leak of confidential details regarding HP's long-term strategy in January, 2006. The independent, third party company used a technique known as pretexting to obtain call records of HP board members and nine journalists, including reporters for CNET, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. Dunn has claimed she did not know the methods the investigators used to determine the source of the leak.[31] Board member George Keyworth was ultimately outed as the source.
On September 12, 2006 Keyworth resigned from the board and HP announced that Mark Hurd, the current CEO and president, would replace Dunn as Chairman after the HP board meeting on January 18, 2007.
On September 22, 2006 Hurd announced at a special press briefing that Dunn had resigned effective immediately from both the Chairmanship role and as a director of the Board;
On September 28, 2006, Ann Baskins, HP's general counsel (head attorney) resigned[32] hours before she was to appear as a witness at which she would later invoke the Fifth Amendment to "not be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime."[33]
Investigation by the government
On October 4, 2006, California Attorney General Bill Lockyer filed criminal charges and arrest warrants against Kevin Hunsaker, Dunn and three outside investigators.[34] On September 11, 2006, the United States House Committee on Energy and Commerce wrote to Patricia Dunn stating that they have been conducting an investigation on Internet-based data brokers who allegedly use "lies, fraud and deception" to acquire personal information, and allow anyone who paid a "modest fee" to acquire "itemized incoming and outgoing call logs", and when had learned about HP's use of pretexting through their September 6 SEC filing and through their own inquiry of HP's Nominating and Governance Committee, stating they are "troubled" by the information, "particularly that it involves HP—one of America's corporate icons."
The committee requested, under Rules X and XI of the United States House of Representatives, information from HP by September 18, 2006:
At the September 28, 2006 hearing, Dunn and Hurd[35] both testified extensively about the investigation. Dunn testified that until June or July 2006, she did not realize that "pretexting" could involve identity misrepresentation. Dunn repeatedly insisted that she had believed that personal phone records could be obtained through legal methods.
Other witnesses refused to answer questions due to the ongoing criminal investigations.[33]
Perceived impact on the company's operations
Despite the intense media coverage, investors continue to show faith in the company. As of October 23, the price of the company's stock had increased from $36.50 to $39.87 per share.[36]
On October 8, 2006 Reuters ran a story describing pretexting used by Hewlett-Packard and other companies.[37]
On October 12, 2006 hp announced the appointment of Jon Hoak as vice president and chief ethics and compliance officer. Hoak served as senior vice president and general counsel for NCR from 1993 until May 2006.[38]
On December 7, 2006 hp paid $14.5 Million to settle civil charges brought by the California Attorney General.[39]
In December 2006, two members of Congress requested that HP provide more information regarding CEO Mark Hurd's sale of $1.4 million of stock options on August 25, the same day he was questioned by attorneys investigating the pretexting scandal.[40] Mark Hurd explained that the August trade was part of his normal investment strategy to diversify assets and was made during a regularly scheduled trading window for senior officers and directors.[citation needed] Additionally, Hurd assured the Subcommittee that the August trade had nothing to do with his interview by attorneys investigating the leak investigation and that he had initiated the trade before any such request had been made to him.

Culture


The founders, known to friends and employees alike as Bill and Dave, developed a unique management style that has come to be known as the HP Way. In Bill's words, the HP Way is "a core ideology ... [which] includes a deep respect for the individual, a dedication to affordable quality and reliability, a commitment to community responsibility, and a view that the company exists to make technical contributions for the advancement and welfare of humanity."[29]
In recent years, and especially under current CEO Mark Hurd, it is widely accepted that the "HP Way" has vanished, never to return. The company has made numerous decisions which de-emphasize the importance and contribution of the average employee, made numerous cuts to benefits, eliminated retirement and retiree health benefits, and made raises a rarity.

Product legacy

Agilent Technologies, not HP, retains the direct product legacy of the original company founded in 1939. Agilent's current portfolio of electronic instruments are descended from HP's very earliest products. HP entered the computer business only after its instrumentation competencies were well-established.
After the acquisition of Compaq in 2002, HP has maintained the "Compaq Presario" brand on low-end home desktops and laptops, the "HP Compaq" brand on business desktops and laptops, and the "HP ProLiant" brand on Intel-architecture servers. (The "HP Pavilion" brand is used on home entertainment laptops and all home desktops.)[27]
HP uses DEC's "StorageWorks" brand on storage systems; Tandem's "NonStop" servers are now branded as "HP Integrity NonStop"

Sponsorships


Mission: Space Sign
HP has many sponsorships. One well known sponsorship is of Walt Disney World's Epcot Park's Mission: SPACE. Others can be found on Hewlett-Packard's website [2]. From 1995 to 1999 they were the shirt sponsor of English Premier League club Tottenham Hotspur. They also sponsored the BMW Williams Formula 1 team. Hewlett-Packard also has the naming rights arrangement for the HP Pavilion at San Jose, home of the San Jose Sharks NHL hockey team.

HP Certified Professionals

HP Certified Professionals

Main article: HP Certified Professional
Hewlett-Packard's Certified Professional (HP-CP) program is organised by job roles. Within each role, there are certification levels. It was developed to confirm the technical skills, sales competencies and knowledge that is required to propose and deploy, service and support technology and solutions sold by HP. HP-CP is intended for customers, resellers, and HP employees.